Admittedly, our screenshot is now also not the measure of all things and complicates the programs text recognition. Nevertheless, the recognized text fields can be edited in no time. Accordingly, this tool also has room for improvement. Wondershare PDFelement, on the other hand, recognizes a much larger portion of text fields, but also converts things that perhaps should not be converted. Clear conversion problems of some text blocks (Foxit PDF Editor) However, a text editor opens in the right sidebar, where simple functions such as the size of the font or the font itself can be set. Some text fields are made unrecognizable or are simply not selectable. We quickly noticed that the Foxit PDF Editor performed much worse than Wondershare PDFelement. After just a few seconds, depending on the length of the document of course, most of the text is editable. ![]() Settings options before text recognition: Wondershare PDFelement (left) and Foxit PDF Editor (right)Īfter confirming the conversion by clicking Apply or OK, both tools start the process. For this purpose, a window opens in each case with a few basic settings. After the image file has been converted into a PDF, both tools ask to start the text recognition or activate OCR, so that text sections in the document can be recognized and subsequently edited. Wondershare PDFelement and also Foxit PDF Editor handled this task quite smoothly. In the first step, we took a screenshot of our website and converted it into a PDF file using both programs. In addition, both providers offer connection to a cloud.įor our practical test, we used the Windows version of the respective software. In addition, both tools can be installed and run on mobile devices with Android or iOS. However, the versions differ significantly between Windows and Mac. Both Wondershare PDFelement and Foxit PDF Editor are available for Windows and Mac respectively. The two rivals also shake hands on the subject of system compatibility. Both Wondershares PDFelement and Foxit PDF Editor benefit from a wide range of features and are true all-rounders when it comes to handling PDF files. However, it would go beyond the scope to highlight every single feature, which is why we have limited ourselves to the most important basics. Of course, we do not want to withhold the range of functions of both programs. So up to this point, it’s all a matter of taste. The Foxit PDF Editor, on the other hand, seems a bit cluttered, but scores with larger icons. Nevertheless, Wondershare’s PDFelement seems to be a bit more intuitive in terms of this. ![]() ![]() User interface Wondershare PDFelementĪs a result, the menu navigation of both tools is similar. All in all, both programs convey a similarity to well-known office applications. PDFelement, on the other hand, is mainly blue and white, which makes the interface look a bit retro, but also tidier. The basic functions differ from each other in color and lighten up the user interface. In terms of design, Foxit PDF Editor comes out on top in our view after opening the software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |